ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PRIVACY PROTECTION MEASURES IN BIG DATA SYSTEMS
- Authors
-
-
Fatima Zafar
Department of Computer Science, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan
-
- Keywords:
- Big Data Privacy, Privacy Preservation, Data Protection Techniques, Privacy Risk Assessment
- Abstract
-
The explosive growth of big data has heightened concerns regarding the effectiveness of privacy protection measures within these systems. This study critically evaluates various privacy-preserving techniques, frameworks, and policies implemented across big data environments. A combination of literature review, case analysis, and comparative assessment is used to measure the efficacy of encryption, anonymization, access controls, and emerging technologies like differential privacy and blockchain. Our findings suggest that while traditional measures provide foundational security, newer adaptive privacy frameworks offer greater resilience against evolving threats. This paper recommends a hybrid approach integrating technical, legal, and ethical strategies to ensure comprehensive privacy protection in big data systems.
- Downloads
-
Download data is not yet available.
- References
-
Gandomi, A., & Haider, M. (2015). Beyond the hype: Big data concepts, methods, and analytics. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 137–144.
Zwitter, A. (2014). Big Data ethics. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 1–6.
Jagadish, H. V. (2015). Big Data and Privacy: Challenges and Opportunities. IEEE Computer, 48(6), 84–87.
Acquisti, A., Taylor, C., & Wagman, L. (2016). The Economics of Privacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(2), 442–492.
Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C., & Shmatikov, V. (2017). Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), 3–18.
Narayanan, A., & Shmatikov, V. (2008). Robust de-anonymization of large sparse datasets. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 111–125.
Ohm, P. (2010). Broken promises of privacy: Responding to the surprising failure of anonymization. UCLA Law Review, 57, 1701–1777.
Voigt, P., & Von dem Bussche, A. (2017). The EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): A Practical Guide. Springer.
Islam, S., Kalloniatis, C., & Mouratidis, H. (2016). Privacy Requirements: Past, Present and Future. 10th International Conference on Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS), 1–11.
Fernandes, E., Jung, J., & Prakash, A. (2017). Security analysis of emerging smart home applications. IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 636–654.
Sandhu, R., Coyne, E. J., Feinstein, H. L., & Youman, C. E. (1996). Role-Based Access Control Models. IEEE Computer, 29(2), 38–47.
Sweeney, L. (2002). k-Anonymity: A model for protecting privacy. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 10(5), 557–570.
Barth-Jones, D. (2012). The 're-identification' of Governor William Weld’s medical information: A critical re-examination of health data de-identification and re-identification. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Dwork, C. (2006). Differential Privacy. Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP), 1–12.
Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016). Blockchains and Smart Contracts for the Internet of Things. IEEE Access, 4, 2292–2303.
Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., et al. (2019). Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.04977.
McGraw, D. (2013). Building public trust in uses of Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act de-identified data. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 20(1), 29–34.
Pearson, S. (2013). Privacy, Security and Trust in Cloud Computing. In Privacy and Security for Cloud Computing (pp. 3–42). Springer.
Kitchin, R. (2016). Getting smarter about smart cities: Improving data privacy and data security. Data Protection Unit, Department of the Taoiseach, Ireland.
Cavoukian, A. (2009). Privacy by Design: The 7 Foundational Principles. Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, Canada.
Wu, H., Yang, P., Asano, Y. M., & Snoek, C. G. M. (2025). Learnable deformation for point cloud self-supervised learning (U.S. Patent Application No. US20250166325A1). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Yang, P., Asano, Y. M., & Snoek, C. G. M. (2024). Self-supervised point cloud ordering using machine learning models (U.S. Patent Application No. US20240161460A1). U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
Ahmad, N. R. (2025). Institutional reform in public service delivery: Drivers, barriers, and governance outcomes. https://doi.org/10.52152/jhs8rn12
Ahmad, N. R. (2025). Urban water service delivery in emerging economies: Fiscal sustainability, cost recovery, and governance performance. International Journal of Business Economics and Administration. https://doi.org/10.24088/IJBEA-2025-10300
- Downloads
- Published
- 2026-12-31
- Section
- Articles
- License
-
Copyright (c) 2026 Fatima Zafar

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in the Journal of Big Data Privacy Management are distributed under the terms of an open-access license, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal the right of first publication. The journal promotes transparency, accessibility, and global dissemination of research findings.
